|
19a. Who are the sons of God [referred to in
Genesis 6:1-4]? (Follow-up)
My
thinking about the Nephilim is based on the fact that Jesus said
there would be no marrying or giving in marriage in heaven.
Therefore, I have always thought that angelic beings (fallen or
otherwise) have no need for reproduction or even the need for it.
The Bible never speaks of angels impregnating human women unless you
take the reference to the "sons of God" marrying the "daughters of
men" as such a reference.
There are occult legends of the Succubus, an evil spirit who can
impregnate human women, but unless I am missing something in
Scripture, I find nothing to base that on. As I stated in my
article, the four options seem to be that the sons of God
mentioned in Genesis are (1) angels, (2) human beings from
aristocratic families, (3) men who walked with God – i.e., had a
special relationship with God, and (4) descendants of Seth. I
feel most comfortable with options 3 or 4, but I admit my decision
rests on human reason not divine revelation. It is, therefore, an
opinion. I would certainly not make it a bone of contention in the
body of Christ.
Take into consideration the fact that the word "giant" means
fallen. I am certainly not a Hebrew scholar, so I am taking the word
of others here. I do know that Genesis 6
is a transition from Creation to the Flood. Dr. Tom Sharp of The
Creation Truth Foundation has a huge human femur bone that indicates
the size of the individual would classify them as a giant! His
conclusion is that prior to the flood, human beings may have been
quite large in addition to living extraordinarily long lives. You
can visit their web site with a simple search, and I believe Dr.
Sharp would answer any queries you might have about his possession.
In my judgment, any discussion about who these Nephilim are comes
back to opinion. Some would argue that a literal understanding of
the text would require them to be fallen angels. Even that statement
needs to be considered carefully since the sentence structure could
lead to a couple of different conclusions.
Question #19
Original question for this follow-up question
|
GospelCom's Bible Gateway
We have linked
to GospelCom's Bible Gateway for your convenience in
studying the Bible. We hope that you will not only
study the verses listed in the sermon notes, but also
expand your study to other areas of the Bible.
However, this service that they provide is appreciated. |
|
Question #18
Would a person
baptized in a church with a different view of baptism
have to be re-baptized to join First Christian Church? |
< | > |
Question #20
Is there a place in
the Bible that speaks against people of different races
dating and/or marrying? |
For more answers,
see
Answers to Ask Mike Questions
Note that views expressed in
external Internet links are not necessarily those of the
staff or members of First Christian Church
|